Page 1 of 1

[closed] Drilling down into displayed landmark subfolders

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:49 pm
by preast
The latest version seems to have lost the ability to drill into subfolders when viewing displayed landmarks. I had been creating KMLs with subfolders in GE and then in AQ would drill down into that KML to toggle whether that subfolder is displayed. It sort of uses subfolders like layers in a way. Now all I see is the top level landmark file (.ldk) but cannot expand it.

Thanks.

Re: Drilling down into displayed landmark subfolders

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 3:44 pm
by Psyberia-Support
Hi,
It's true that things changed a little when displayed a whole file. In the previous version, all items in the files were listed independently (not following folders or any order, just listed), whereas now there is only one file entry.
I'll try to add the ability to list the file content and select the items to display or not. Right now, if you need to control their display independenly, you need to display them independently (and not use "Display content" on the file).
Best regards

Re: Drilling down into displayed landmark subfolders

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 6:52 pm
by preast
This might be a little ironic in that I actually requested previously for items to show up under one folder like they are, but didn't anticipate that you wouldn't be able to expand it. If you added that, it would be awesome but I'm wondering if I can get around it by just putting everything in their own subfolders under the main KML folder, and then do like you say (display each folder separately).

Thanks!

Re: Drilling down into displayed landmark subfolders

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 12:01 am
by preast
OK, I tried it out and reorganized my KML items into a catch-all folder under the main KML folder, so no item is at the root KLM folder. Now I can still import the single KML file into a single folder and then just display/undisplay the subfolders as sets. Allowing the ability to drill down would be nice, but not a must-have if I just restructure my KMLs in GE a bit, which I probably should have done in the first place.

Thanks again.